Italy appears on a no-travel list for 2026, though not because of Rome’s usual crowd control issues.
Instead, attention has turned to Isola Sacra, a coastal district near Fiumicino where plans for a major new cruise port have triggered environmental and community concerns.
Why was Isola Sacra added to Fodor’s No List 2026?
Isola Sacra appears on Fodor’s No List 2026 due to plans for the Fiumicino Waterfront, a large-scale cruise port project backed by Royal Caribbean and Icon Infrastructure.
According to Fodor’s, the key issues include:
- the expansion of the cruise industry near Rome
- environmental risks linked to large-scale dredging
- potential damage to protected coastal ecosystems
- opposition from residents and environmental associations
The Fiumicino Waterfront project: what’s planned?
Isola Sacra lies about 20 miles from Rome, between the Tyrrhenian Sea and the mouth of the Tiber. The Fiumicino Waterfront project would introduce a new cruise and leisure port along this stretch of coastline.
Plans include:
- berths for around 1,000 small boats
- a pier for mega cruise ships over 230 feet high and more than 1,150 feet long
- capacity for ships carrying up to 6,000 passengers
- commercial development, including hotels and new buildings
Local authorities argue the port would bring jobs and strengthen the area’s tourism economy. Campaigners have opposed the scheme for more than a decade, questioning whether the long-term impact has been fully assessed.
Environmental concerns for the project
Environmental impact sits at the centre of the debate. According to Fodor, officials state that the development complies with EU protections for sensitive habitats. However, critics point out that the full Environmental Impact Assessment has yet to be finalised.
Among the main concerns are:
- dredging more than 105 million cubic feet of sand to create a deep channel
- relocating 1.6 million tonnes of sand to Fregene beach to counter erosion
- changes to water flow at the mouth of the Tiber River
- risks to dunes, wetlands and surrounding farmland
- construction taking place just 1,000 feet from a protected natural area
Local opposition, heritage concerns and traffic pressure
For many residents, the debate goes beyond a single construction project. There are fears that large-scale redevelopment could permanently alter a stretch of coast that still feels relatively unspoilt.
Campaigners have also raised concerns about cultural heritage. Traditional bilancioni — wooden stilted fishing huts that line parts of the shore — could be affected if the area becomes heavily commercialised.
Infrastructure is another sticking point. Fiumicino already deals with significant airport traffic, and critics argue that thousands of cruise passengers heading to Rome would place further strain on local roads and increase air pollution.
Should travellers rethink Isola Sacra in 2026?
Isola Sacra is not currently overwhelmed by visitors. Compared with central Rome, it remains relatively low-key. The debate centres on what the area could become if large cruise ships begin docking there regularly.
Fodor’s listing reflects concern about the long-term consequences of expanding cruise infrastructure in fragile coastal zones. In Italy, the conversation is less about discouraging travel and more about weighing economic gain against environmental and community costs.
Stay in the know about all things Italy—get our weekly newsletter for the latest travel, legal, and lifestyle news.